strategic entanglement on the back of a tortured beloved boy and his scientist mummy or about mk ultra within austrian government and authorities

Actual writing to courts, asking for a judge who is not personally entangled or MK-ed –

 

 

 

Mag. Riegler Andrea

(formerly Mag. Sadegh Eslami Andrea)

Margaretenguertel 24-34/1/3

1050 Vienna

 

Head of Court Mag. Schmidt, Ulrike

District Court Innere Stadt, Marxergasse 1a, 1010 Vienna              

 

Appeal Court for Civil Cases, Vienna

Schmerlingplatz 10-11, 1010 Vienna                                                                                   Vienna, 02.09.2019

 

 

Appeal to 32 Nc61/19i

 

 

Riegler Andrea, formerly Sadegh Eslami (*20.11.1971), hereinafter referred to as the appellant,

 

appeals against the order of the head of the court, Mag. Schmidt, Ulrike

 

within the 14-day deadline for reply.

 

Furthermore, Riegler Andrea reserves the right to take further steps out of all legal possibilities.

 

WARNING: THIS LETTER OF COMPLAINT COULD MASSIVELY TRIGGER THOSE AFFECTED BY MK ULTRA, LEAD TO UNWANTED PERSONALITY CHANGES AND PAINFUL MEMORIES.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND:

 

Since 2011ff, the appellant has urgently requested that her now 10-year-old son, Sadegh Dara Rubens (20.02.2009), be thoroughly examined via MRI/CT/nuclear-medical scans on the basis of serious suspicions that her son has been subjected to – ongoing – torture since at least 2011.

 

The reports of Dara Rubens Sadegh – which were sent in writing to the District Court of BG Hernals/Vienna, Judge MMag. Konrad Kubiczek and also the public prosecutor’s office of Vienna, prosecution officer Mag. Petra Freh, and also the police department of Wattgasse/Vienna, Manfred Miksits, and others – contained reports of the then 2 ½-year-old toddler ranging from physical violence and rapes to ritual violence and waterboarding. In detail, these involved: rapes (oral and anal), the hunting of the child, use of drugs, use of medical torture (experiments with light, loud noises, destruction of the inner genitals, drilling/piercing the tooth root), ridicule & mockery (being laughed at during the torture), being buried alive, being subjected to waterboarding, spinning, heat and cold (e.g. forced to wear a ski suit in summer), working as a child prostitute (ballet dress, swimming trunks, makeup, high-heeled shoes, customers, money), being conditioned using torture (the child repeatedly hits himself on the head with one hand, while pulling his hair with the other and practices “looking happy” and “laughing” by saying “ha ha”, while his carotid artery is visible over his entire neck as he tries to grin), sudden changes of personality, vows, pledges, oaths (satanic components) and near-death experiences: in sum, the then 2 ½-year-old victim reported physical, psychic, spiritual and mental abuse. Subsequently, even after the Austrian government took custody of the child, there were further signs of torture on him after 2012, as well as sensory deprivation programming in 2015, all of which became unmistakably evident during the supervised visits of the mother, Andrea Sadegh, to her son, and were brought to court even then – without success. This kind of torture is known in the specialist literature as “ritual abuse” and also as “trauma-based mind control” or “MK-Ultra”. This crime, which, due to the horrendous lifelong injuries of the children, can only be carried out under state protection, is defined by one expert as follows: “Ritual abuse can be defined as a wide variety of very different crimes, whose common denominator ultimately simply consists of extreme sadism, together with a certain continuity and systematic methods.” Noblitt & Perskin, quoting Hans Ulrich Gresch.“ (quotation from http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/index.php/fall-sadegh-ueberblick/lang=en – „Sadegh Case Cover Up“)

 

[1] This continuity and systematic approach – as outlined by the psychologist Dr. Hans Ulrich Gresch and compared with his book “Invisible Chains”, which was repeatedly sent to the courts and the authorities – is escalating MK Ultra into the systematic torture-based training of future executives who are prepared for their respective jobs during their entire “childhood”. Regarding the activity profile of these MK Ultra concerned (MK-ed ones), the reading of “Svali” is recommended. Svali, the writer of several articles and books is a double academic who was active as a trauma trainer, officially as a teacher, in just such criminal networks (compare, among other things, link on https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali_book_svali_speaks, and also her far-reaching assistance on www.deprogramwiki.com). Thus, not surprisingly, one finds world-wide in politics, media, management, authorities, so also in courts and public prosecutor’s offices and secret services an extremely high density of MK-ed ones.

 

⇒ Due to the special history of Austria – since the Habsburg Monarchy the country was used as the military arm of the Jesuits, alongside countless Masonic lodges (O.T.O. was founded in Vienna, among other happenings) – Austria has been a stronghold of this crime, most lately since the transfer of the SS Medical Academy from Berlin to Graz in 1941. This academy has, of course, never been closed, and therefore Austria enjoys international prestige in secret service circles (…). Austrian sportsmen, politicians, transgender programmed, university professors, priests especially out of the Catholic churches, etc. – there is not one area in which MK Ultra is not applied.[2]

 

Back to the Sadegh case:

The young Sadegh Dara Rubens identified and named 72+ perpetrators between 2011 and 2012[3], yet the appellant’s intensive research on the perpetrator networks led not only to a “child removal” without a court order on 13 February 2012, but also to an “entanglement delirium” of the Austrian judiciary and school medicine/health care system[4]. These actions were patronized above all by the Austrian secret services[5], while the appellant was repeatedly assassinated in a manner which threatened her life, both at home and abroad. These assassinations are ongoing.

 

In 2011/12, entanglements (between perpetrator networks and Austrian authorities) were already apparent. See http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/index.php/chronologie-einer-vertuschung/ which details how the identified perpetrators act and operate within the Austrian authority and judiciary systems (collected until 2015 and enclosed). All cases have been fully reported to the authorities, so far without any result: this form of negligence and complicity is described as common practice in MK ultra cases in international literature.

 

The appellant had returned from Norway in early December 2018, and at the beginning of January 2019 pictorial material of her now 10-year-old son was sent to her. Officially this was a letter from the child to his mother in which he wished her a Merry Christmas in January 2019 and further commented that he would be fine with “Grandma and Grandpa” (Bretterklieber), while the attached picture showed the not even 10-year-old child with all of his adult teeth missing. [6]/[7]

 

In this letter he also refers to his subsequently deleted YouTube channel[8], which contained videos from Autumn 2018 in which the child, visibly suffering massive pain and shock after torture because of his teeth, is not able to speak age-appropriately, instead using a “German” High German. This use of dialect suggests his programmers are from Germany, since it can be absolutely excluded that foster parents or even teachers speak a “German” High German in Hausmannstätten near Graz; even the appellant is only able to speak “Austrian” High German even though she is a Germanist and a literary scholar. The completely deleted YouTube channel of the child can be presented to the court as evidence.

 

A few days before receiving this letter, the applicant’s repeated research had revealed further close connections between perpetrator groups and the Austrian judiciary. As all of this occurred,  further assassination attempts were made against the applicant, a scientist and activist against extreme abuse and torture on toddlers and children worldwide, who has successfully run the network against torture on toddlers and children for years, traumabasedmindcontrol.com.

 

 

 

 

REASONS FOR THE APPEAL:

Judge Dr. Gottwald Heidemarie, LL.M. took over the file (7P25/13y) of the “erroneous” expert lunacy report written by Dr. Zeitler Michaela in 2013. This expert administration came about suggestively in 2013, in that the Austrian courts never investigated the child Sadegh, Dara Rubens, and with no genuine evidence concluded that “the child had nothing, it was a well-supported, intelligent child”, and that the scientist and mother of the child, must be “mentally ill”. The child was never examined via MRI/CT/nuclear medicine or psychiatrically, and the countless applications for evidence by the scientist and mother of the child, here the appellant, Riegler Andrea, were ignored every time. The application for the first assessment came from the Civil Rights Court ZRS Vienna under the judge, Konstanze Thau, who is married to the psychiatrist, Prof. Dr. Kenneth Thau: both also are offering psychologically motivated classes in their spare time and have been mentioned several times by protecting parents as “assessment administrator stimulators” – meaning as soon as a protective parent reports to courts and/or police regarding their tortured children, judge Konstanze Thau recommends an “assessment” of the protective parent:

 

⇒ Here it is now indispensable to know that in crimes such as MK Ultra, medical doctors, especially psychiatrists, are always the main perpetrators. Without their professional expertise no torture-based programming, as it is called in specialist jargon, is possible. In the English-speaking world there are several psychiatrists and psychologists who express their professional opinions on these practices, warning the population and governments worldwide against them. (compare above all the psychiatrist Dr. Colin A. med. Ross, who, in addition to extensively published specialist literature, has also founded his own institute on this subject, see https://www.rossinst.com/).

 

⇒ Contrary to habits of the USA, it should also be noted that in Austria the MK Ultra agendas are less in the hands of the military and the secret services, but directly in the hands of the Austrian medical profession and judiciary. This is to be attributed to the presence of the SS Medical Academy in Graz, as well to Dr. Sigmund Freud, one of the first known MK Ultra doctors here in Austria. The unlimited power of these two professional groups became visible in the Nuremberg war crimes trials, where practically not a single conviction of the medical profession was pronounced and not a single judge was convicted.

 

In the Sadegh case the suggestive circumstance has now come to light that the mentioned psychiatrist, Dr. Kenneth Thau, is even being promoted by Dr. Lansky Gabriel’s law firm. In the Sadegh case this law firm represents “Jewish” perpetrators, and is also known as the law firm of the deep state with close contacts to Mossad/CIA. Out of the 72 perpetrators identified by Sadegh Dara Rubens, 6 perpetrators are “Jewish” and this law firm represents 4 officially. Six such perpetrators are: Mag. Mitteräcker Alexander (son of the Mossad/CIA secret service agent Oscar Bronner, who is one of the best friends of former Federal President Dr. Fischer Heinz); Prof. Dr. med. Tepper Gabor; Prof. Dr. med. Scheer, Peter; and Prof. Dr. med. Dunitz-Scheer, Marguerite; as well as Mag. Scholz-Lauppert Kathrin and her husband, Mag. Lauppert Egon: the latter four suing the applicant under the patronage of and with the official Jewish Congregation of Austria.

 

⇒ For a better understanding it has to be pointed out again that in MK Ultra the respective secret services stick together on a supranational level and execute orders from the supranational secret service. In 2011, the child Sadegh Dara Rubens already reported that officially “Jewish” perpetrators have committed torture on him hand in hand, i.e. together with National Socialist perpetrators – such as the Kutschera Institute, which has ample contacts with American secret services[9]. In her two books “The Enslaved Queen” and “White Witch in a Black Robe”, Wendy Hoffman, a Jewish therapist and MK Ultra survivor, also describes that, growing up as a Jewish child of a Jewish lawyer in New York/USA, she had already been sold by her father to Dr. Josef Mengele (the infamous concentration camp physician) in the early 1940s as a small child (long before the war ended). The technical jargon speaks of a cooperation between Nazi/CIA and Mossad/CIA, clarifying the cooperation of supranational secret services, since at present the strings always run together at the CIA. Others subsume this organization as “Illuminati”.

 

⇒ Besides the horrendous child abuse of the Catholic Church and the bestial human experiments of the Nazis, it has become internationally known especially in the last months that it is “trendy ” among rich Israelis at present to book “torture vacations”, partly because of their own “MK Ultra revenge programming” (see “Nakam”), and partly in order to keep up with the “social developments” of a perverted “elite”, as is standard practice worldwide. In 2011, the child Sadegh Dara Rubens already showed signs of having been tortured in a (former) concentration camp; naturally conclusions are drawn about the lively interest of the Viennese Jewish religious congregation in taking part as a joint plaintiff in the Sadegh case merely because they are named on the website www.traumabasedmindcontrol.com. According to international experts, these toddlers and child torture packages are booked and paid for on a flat-rate basis, and impunity is always guaranteed in the respective country. Hundreds of Jewish whistleblowers are currently desperately trying to draw attention to the MK Ultra programming that is widespread in Judaism worldwide and Jewish victims are regarded as enormously important witnesses, worldwide, who even had their own publishing house – the Karnac Publishing House in London – as their mouthpiece until the sale of this very publishing house in 2017. 

 

Back to the Sadegh case:

After the government-organized child abduction in 2012 on the grounds of an alleged “danger in progress”, (initiated without the presence of a doctor or judge by employees of the Youth Welfare Office Graz as well as the non-medical staff of the University Clinic Graz), the applicant was not only stalked by secret services, but also psychiatrically examined only months later by Dr. Lenzinger, Elisabeth, who was sent from court to check the mental state as well the parenting abilities of the mother, without having seen the applicant together with her beloved son. At the same time, the husband of the certified sworn expert was affected by a repeated company bankruptcy, but more importantly, is precisely this certified sworn expert, Dr. Lenzinger Elisabeth personally known to the perpetrator circles in the Sadegh case and was repeatedly brought to court by Andrea Riegler. Dr. Lenzinger’s expert opinion[10] was submitted to American professors in 2015 and could not even be ” nullified ” due to the massively poor quality of the expert opinion, since the horrendous quality of the expert opinion would speak for itself, as already brought to court by the applicant in 2012, since the expert opinion is more reminiscent of a creative collage than of an expert opinion.[11]

 

In 2013 it was proven that Dr. Zeitler Michaela, BG Innere Stadt, had falsified court records. Prof. Dr. Pakesch, Georg[12], a psychiatric expert of the Republic of Austria who is himself affected by MK Ultra, was “sexually” aroused during the descriptions of the torture injuries of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens in conversation with the child’s mother, a scientist and the applicant for this appeal, while he greedily sucked up all the details about the suffering of the 2 1/2 year old toddler. All courts and “experts” have – repeatedly – “accidentally” failed to verify the assumption that the child’s scientist mother was mentally ill by finally conducting a comprehensive examination of the applicant’s son in conventional medicine, as well as a police confrontation with the identified and named perpetrators.

 

While the child’s mother and scientist, Mag. Riegler Andrea – who not only has a profound education as a text scientist (master’s degree in Comparative Literature, German Studies), but also as an academically certified market and opinion researcher, trainer, coach as well as a life and social counsellor – continued to hand in complaints with descriptions of severe torture committed on the child in governmental care after the boy was taken, as well as about murder attempts, (partly with handing in the names to courts when the secret service officials were recognized and literally every petition for evidence “stimulated” a new administration of expert opinions or the new evidence got lost or ignored, like in the case of the infamous administrator Dr. Weiser Martin, who is known in witness circles for acting as treasurer of the Grand Lodge and who is deeply involved in the paedo-criminal networks within the Republic of Austria). The fact that the applicant seamlessly resumed her job as a trainer in adult education – for the Austrian Ministry of Labor – immediately after the child was taken until the end of 2014 is particularly notable: if the applicant had been so severely mentally ill as described by psychiatric sworn experts, she would not have been able to lead groups with complex backgrounds or to coach them, just as she would not be able to live and work in foreign countries (London/UK, Asia, Norway, etc.).

 

In a letter to the appellant in 2015/2016, the head of the court, Mag. Schmidt Ulrike, described the inspection administration carried out in 2013 as an “error”, without, however, ever having had the child Sadegh Dara Rubens examined by means of MRT/CT/nuclear medicine.

 

In her order of 20.08.2019, (delivered on 21.08.2019), the head of court, Mag. Schmidt Ulrike, also tries to portray the torture of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens and the simultaneous destruction of the existence of the appellant, (scientist and crown witness, Mag. Riegler Andrea, via the stigmatization as “mentally ill”) as two completely independent proceedings which would have nothing to do with each other.[13]:

 

Mag. Schmidt Ulrike insinuates in her decision that an inspection administration and an application for custody at the Graz Ost District Court would be two completely different things, which would have to be legally examined independently of each other. Here the question arises: which court would assign the custody of a complexly tortured (small) child to a person under guardianship and shows the repeated – open – bias of the head of the court, Mag. Schmidt Ulrike. At minimum this magistrate is only concerned with avoiding private liability and compensation payments for the legal procedure since 2013ff in the Sadegh case.

 

 

Back to the beginning of the current “procedure”:

As of February 2019, Dr. Gottwald, Heidemarie LL.M suggested a new inspection administration of the scientist and appellant, Mag. Riegler Andrea, without informing her. Only a representation network for adults (Erwachsenenvertretung Wien 4) was allegedly contacted by the district court BG Innere Stadt to perform a “clearing” as well was ordered to make a “house visit” [!] – without having submitted a court order, neither to the mentioned network, nor to the applicant for appeal, Mag. Riegler Andrea. The social worker of this network for adults, Franz Pöschl, did not even make a danger report in 2013 regarding the tortured child Sadegh Dara Rubens – with horrendous consequences so far and was sent out again:

 

Despite repeated inquiries by the appellant, no ruling has been received to date. Also, the representation network – again social worker Franz Pöschl, (who has admitted via e-mail, i.e. in writing, that he was coerced by the district court BG Innere Stadt to carry out a clearing, and even to perform a house visit), was unable to present a court order.[14]

 

Previously, in January 2019, the appellant Mag. Riegler Andrea urgently asked the Graz Ost District Court for an investigation of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens. She also repeatedly applied for custody, as well as for a family DNA test, and apparently this court repeatedly did not take action due to the new “lunacy expert investigation” of the BG Innere Stadt District Court, which shows how much the courts here simply cooperate without keeping the welfare of the child in mind in any way – here of Sadegh Dara Rubens.

 

EXCURSUS:

To be able to understand the procedure here, it is unfortunately necessary to point out that these networks operate within the states worldwide via ” fragmentation “, so not only the psyche of the affected toddlers and children is fragmented, but also the petitions for evidence and court proceedings. The Sadegh case is now in the following courts:

District Court BG Hernals

Prosecution Office Vienna (8+ record numbers)

District Court Vienna BG Innere Stadt (6+ record numbers)

District Court BG Graz Ost

Administrative Court Styria Steiermark

Higher Administrative Court Vienna Wien

Constitutional court Wien

Prosecution Office Graz (8+ record numbers)

Supreme Court

Human Rights Court Strasburg

Commission of torture of United Nations

Youth Welfare department Graz

Youth Welfare department Wien

Police inspectorate Vienna Wattgasse

Police inspectorates in whole Austria

Administrative Court of the Canton of Basel/Switzerland

Civil Rights Courts Vienna ZRS Wien

Civil Rights Courts ZRS Graz

District administration Styria (Graz)

Austrian Medical Council

Austrian Chamber of Lawyers

Economic and Corruption Prosecutor’s Office

Tax office Vienna

Representation Network Adult Representation Vienna 4

In addition to numerous child “protection” centers.

Etc.

 

More than 40 government and court employees, i.e. judges and public prosecutors, have been “occupied” with the Sadegh case since 2011ff, while the child, Sadegh Dara Rubens – who is at the center and has always been – is subjected to further ritual torture as well as to MK Ultra. To this date, the child has never been examined by means of a profound classic medical clarification via MRT/CT/nuclear medicine.

 

This procedure, (which resembles an unparalleled spectacle of justice in Austria, and has already caused and continues to cause international attention as a “major international case” in the opinion of international experts), also has a deeper background: the strategic entanglement as already communicated to the courts since 2011ff. Highly educated Austrian judges and medical doctors are not stupid – the case serves to ongoingly entangle judges and authority officials, as well youth welfare employees, police officers to pre-school teachers and schools, further medical doctors, etc.[15]

 

Years of research and discussions with experts have clearly revealed that in the Sadegh case everything had been planned for decades, which also explains the high proportion of perpetrators from former friends and acquaintances of the appellant, Mag. Riegler Andrea. These perpetrators had already been recognized and named by the child Sadegh Dara Rubens after being tortured by them in 2011.

 

Riegler Andrea is a former MK Ultra victim, who has been used for years – like most of the victims, without knowing it – for top-class secret service operations without payment and without consent, here mainly by the Austrian secret services. Afterwards, she was used for the creation of an international case of strategic entanglement on the back of the beloved child: she had a childhood in the MK Ultra program, years of training, especially academic (MK Ultra “Thule programming” as well as “Wewelsburg programming”), to then be involuntarily inseminated with the semen from an unknown person[16] by an intelligence agent who pretended to be a loving partner, Sadegh-Eslami Farrokh. Subsequently the beloved child of the applicant – as usual – was kidnapped and transferred as “secret service property” for MK Ultra, which includes torture and years of drill. Multiple applications for paternity tests have already been ignored in the judge’s office of MMag Konrad Kubiczek of BG Hernals, who himself is deeply involved in the Sadegh case. The question arises as to why this very judge, who presented himself as the “father” towards the child in 2011, has strictly refused this paternity test, and since then no other court has wanted to carry out this paternity test.

 

⇒ It is important to remember here that these children are filmed during torture and during these “sadistic” rituals, as are the participants, meaning the perpetrators.

 

⇒ It is known from specialist literature that during torture rituals the “real” biological fathers present themselves to the children as their “fathers”, telling the children the truth about the “real biological genetic” paternity, which leads to a horrendous confusion of the little ones (…).

 

⇒ It is well known in the specialist literature that politicians, as well as the leaders of corporations, the media, etc., have to take part in these torture rituals on toddlers and children before they receive these positions and jobs in order to be in the hands of the actual rulers, often called “shadow government” or “deep state”. (Compare Epstein case, the case of Ronald Bernard, etc.). From these actual cases it is also known that in the upper ranks, children must be fathered as a kind of demonstration of courage and power in order to be accepted into the 33+ degrees.

 

⇒ It is also necessary to keep MK Ultra victims with perpetrator programming in the respective programming again and again – via further crimes – because otherwise they could find healing. For this, MK Ultra “victims” are needed, who have to be tortured, stalked and in any case kept existentially low by perpetrators as well as by their offspring for the rest of their lives, and also explains the usual manhunts. It is therefore not surprising that the child Sadegh Dara Rubens also reported on manhunts against him in 2011, as well as on the fact that even toddlers and children known to him personally were present at the torture acts and must have made him “ouch” (see charges against Riegler Sebastian, Angelo Sarah, as well as against the children of Gudrun Hohenberger Zwettler). Subsequently, the children of the perpetrators as adults are responsible for ensuring that the victims remain silent forever.

 

⇒ Many Austrian politicians, judges and public prosecutors are affected by this form of violence, as are their international colleagues. The bestial cruelty with which the Austrian judiciary has left the child Sadegh Dara Rubens to himself and to his torturers since his infancy, bears witness to the state of MK -ed ones within the Austrian judiciary: Judges and Prosecution officers under MK Ultra either cannot look into the case, because the child’s suffering unconsciously reminds them of their own suffering, or do not want to look, because they have been programmed to be perpetrators. The most suggestive examples – which are also easy for laymen to see – are the former chancellor Kurz Sebastian and the chancellor of the Transitional Government, Judge Dr. Bierlein Brigitte, in addition to the export hit Schwarzenegger Arnold, who is also involved in Austrian child trafficking rings, as well as the former Foreign Minister and former operator of a whistleblower platform, Dr. Kneissl Karin, who made international headlines with her kneeling in front of Vladimir Putin and doing the Illuminati greeting hand sign during her wedding celebration.

 

 

CONCLUSION:

In Austria there is a nest of MK Ultra due to the National Socialist home base, as well as the Jesuit military base. There is no other country of the world where the density of people affected by MK Ultra so high, especially among officials – as numerous witness statements historically prove.

 

 In no other country in the world do psychiatrists have such access and influence on the lives and thinking of ordinary citizens, which has led to more and more corruption, open torture of small children (compare, alongside the Sadegh case, the hush money affair of the “Weisser Ring” and the “SPÖ” (Austrian Socialist Party) with more than 2.000 infants affected by torture in 2013/2014) and most recently to the dissolution of the Austrian government – see “Ibiza affair”. This country is therefore extremely attractive for international secret services which, as briefly explained, cooperate on a supranational level – in the Sadegh case above all visible as Nazi/CIA and Mossad/CIA, as well as for “child porn torture tourism”.

 

The applicant is aware that she will not be able to stop these networks on her own and will therefore continue – until her beloved son is back with her – to devote herself exclusively to educational work and assistance in terms of healing and relief.

 

Nonetheless, torture and slavery are extremely serious crimes that are not subject to a statute of limitations and the applicant repeatedly reminds here that she reserves the right to sue for damages and reparations – also in the name of her son: Lifelong torture, lifelong exploitation and “manhunts” by secret services or special units of secret services, sabotage of de facto all professional careers, destruction of property, health, insemination with the semen of an unknown person (applications for evidence on the “biological” father can be submitted in particular, also with names) during upright marriage/partnership with a secret service employee, Abduction and destruction of the child for MK Ultra, years of torture, escape, neurological damage by laser weapons and microwave weapons, poisoning, in addition to mental erosion via techniques of “operative psychology”, known primarily under “Zersetzung”, as well as ongoing use for secret service operations without payment and without consent, et al.

 

Here again the written statement of the head of the court, Mag. Ulrike Schmidt, should be remembered, pretending in her ruling of 20.08.2019 not to be able to “remember” the Sadegh case including the international wave of protests in the year 2015. This behavior is more than questionable within the Austrian judiciary, especially head of the courts, like Mag. Schmidt Ulrike is responsible for the Austrian judiciary system, that almost breaks apart due to overload[17]: A complete investigation of the child via MRI/CT/nuclear medicine, including a police parade with the 72+ named and known perpetrators, would have solved the case completely as early as 2011ff. Without detailed examinations of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens, the courts have been turning in circles for years now – at the taxpayers’ expense – and allowing the further destruction of the child (compare the missing adult teeth of the child not even 10 years old) as well as the destruction of the child’s mother and scientist, Mag. Riegler Andrea, who is currently (?) in early retirement for health reasons.

 

More importantly, however, the appellant would like to explicitly point out that every individual who has received torture-based MK Ultra programming has life-long scars – here especially coccyx/pelvis, brain stem, teeth/tooth root canal/palate, eyes, ears, soles of the feet, inner genitals, (missing) glands – which can be proven life-long by MRI/CT/nuclear medical examinations. Therefore, the scientific statements of the appellant, scientist and mother of the child, Mag. Riegler Andrea, are entirely provable.

 

As mentioned at the beginning, all of these circumstances and connections are completely unknown to the judge Dr. Gottwald, Heidemarie LL.M. – officially – this same judge has also failed to deliver and justify decisions, and neglects to familiarize herself with the case in any form when she pretends not to even know the sex of the concerned child, Dara Rubens Sadegh, whom she (for safety’s sake officially) describes as a girl in the court files,

 

and therefore, the appellant, Mag. Riegler Andrea, repeatedly requests to change this judge, as Dr. Gottwald Heidemarie LL.M is not prepared for the Sadegh case.

 

Furthermore, Riegler Andrea reserves the right to take further steps out of all legal possibilities and sees this appeal as a gentle and cautious overview of the actual dimension, which might be difficult to understand without experts on MK Ultra and experts on secret service operations.

 

The appellant also points out that this letter will be published on the network site traumabasedmindcontrol.com, also in English translation, also with picture material of the responsible officials and judges, etc. in order to give also further concerned children – also the children of perpetrators – as adults the chance to stop these crimes – by (self-) complaints.

 

Sincerely,

Mag. Riegler Andrea

 

 

 

Enclosures

Chronologie einer Vertuschung – http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/index.php/chronologie-einer-vertuschung/ – (2011-2015)

 

List of names of perpetrators named and recognized by MJ Dara Sadegh (2011/2012) – http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/16.02.2016_Anmahnung_T%C3%A4teranzeigen.pdf – – – http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Beilage24_beteiligte-personen-eine-auswahl-28102012_Beilage24.pdf

 

Photo of the 10-year-old MJ Sadegh Dara Rubens from January 2019, which shows him without his adult teeth (see below)

 

 

Instead of more enclosures:

Due to secret service stalking, several original documents were published on www.traumabasedmindcontrol.com (“Sadegh Case”), further enclosures, applications for evidence, evidence can be submitted in full.

 

Correspondence with the Adult Representation Network mentioned above can, of course, be submitted as well

 

Medical certificates for 3 assassinations as well as the corresponding complaints, which have been submitted to the public prosecutor’s office in Vienna, can be submitted subsequently.

 

Further specialist literature can be consulted at www.traumabasedmindcontrol.com – chapter “Sources”, here primarily “Primary sources” and “Secondary sources” and outlines a fraction of the currently available specialist literature on the subject – enclosed is a modest excerpt from the now far more extensive sources:

 

Sources (a selection):

Braun, Christina von; Dietze, Gabriele: Multiple Persönlichkeiten. Krankheit, Medium oder Metapher? Verlag Neue Kritik, 1999

Darnell, John: Satanic Strategies in the 21st Century Exposed. Satanic Ritual Abuse. Nephilim. UFOs. Second Heaven. How Churches are Being Infiltrated. And More… Eigenverlag, Canberra: 2013

DeCamp, John W.: The Franklin Cover-Up. Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder i in Nebraska. AWT: 1996 (2nd Edition)

Deichgräber, Karl: Der hippokratische Eid : Text griechisch und deutsch, Interpretation, Nachleben. N.N.: 1983

Epstein, Orit Badouk and Wingfield Schwartz, Joseph & Rachel: Ritual Abuse and Mind Control. Karnac, London, 2011.

Fliß, Claudia und Igney, Claudia (Hg.): Handbuch rituelle Gewalt. Erkennen. Hilfe für Betroffene. Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich 2012. (2. Auflage)

Freyd, Jennifer J.: Betrayal Trauma. The Logic of Forgetting Childhood Abuse. Harvard University Press, Cambridge: 1996

Freyd, Jennifer & Birrell, Pamela: Blind to Betrayal. Why we fool ourselves – We aren´t beeing fooled. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey: 2013

Fröhling, Ulla: Vater unser in der Hölle: Durch Inzest und den Missbrauch in einer satanistischen Sekte zerbrach Angelas Seele. Bastei Lübbe, Bergisch Gladbach: 2008

Gresch, Hans Ulrich: Unsichtbare Ketten. Der Missbrauch der Hypnose und anderer Trance-Techniken durch Kriminelle, Sekten und Geheimdienste. Eigen verlag: Nürnberg, 2003: http://www.orwell-staat.de/cms/files/mindcontrol.pdf

Hedges, Lawrence: Remembering, Repeatig, and Working Through Childhood Trauma: The Psychodynamics of Recovered Memories, Multiple Personality, Ritual Abuse, Incest, Molest and Abduction. Jason Aronson Inc, London: 1994

Herman, Judith: Die Narben der Gewalt. Traumatische Erfahrungen verstehen und überwinden. Junfermann Verlag, Paderborn 2010. (3. Auflage)

Hirigoyen, Marie-France: Die Masken der Niedertracht. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München 2011 (12. Auflage)

Hoffman, Wendy: The Enslaved Queen. A Memoir about Electricity and Mind Control. Karnac, London 2014


Hoffman, Wendy: White Witch in a Black Robe: A True Story about Criminal Mind Control. Karnac, London 2015

Huber, Michaela: Multiple Persönlichkeiten. Seelische Zersplitterung nach Gewalt. Durchgesehene Neuauflage. Junfermann Verlag, Paderborn 2010. (Überarbeitete Neuauflage, Erstauflage 1995, Fischer)

Karriker, W., Becker, T., Overkamp, B., & Rutz, C. (2015): Findings from the 2007 Extreme Abuse Survey (EAS) Series. Online at http://endritualabuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Findings-from-the-2007-EAS-Series-June-25-2016.pdf

Lacter, Ellen and K Lehman, K. Guidelines to diagnosis of ritual abuse/mind control traumatic stress. Attachment 2(2) 2008 pp.159-81.

Lacter, Ellen: www.endritualabuse.org

Lacter, Ellen: http://www.whale.to/b/lacter2.html:

Simple to Moderately Complex Programming

Moderately to Very Complex Programming

Some Indicators of Mind Control Programming.

Lacter, Ellen: A Coloring Book of Healing Images for Adult Survivors of Child Abuse. Self Publishing, San Diego: 2015

Luukanen Kilde, Rauni-Leena: Bright Light on Black Shadows. Infonurt2 Bohdan Szewczyk, Georgetown: 2015

Miller, Alice: Der gemiedene Schlüssel. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1991

Miller, Alice: Am Anfang war Erziehung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1980

Miller, Alison: Healing the Unimaginable. Treating Ritual Abuse and Mind Control. Karnac, London: 2012

Miller, Alison: Becoming Yourself. Overcoming Mind Control and Ritual Abuse. Karnac, London: 2014

Miller, Alison: Werde, wer Du wirklich bist. Mind-Control und Rituelle Gewalt überwinden. Asanger, Kröning: 2016

Malleus Maleficarum. Der Hexenhammer.

Nathan, Debbie: Satan’s Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt. Basic Books Publisher, New York: 1998

Noble, Kim: All of Me. Piatkus, London, 2011

Noblitt Perskin, Randy and Pamela: Ritual Abuse in the Twenty-First Century: Psychological, Forensic, Social, and Political Considerations, Reed, 2011

Noblitt Perskin, Randy and Pamela: Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America. Greenwood Press, Westport: 2000

O’Brien, Cathy; Phillips Mark: Die Tranceformation Amerikas. Die wahre Lebensgeschichte einer CIA-Sklavin unter Mind-Control. Mosquito Verlag, Potsdam: 2005 (3. Auflage)

Reijden, Joël van der: Beyond the Dutroux Affair: The reality of protected child abuse and snuff Networks, 2007:https://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair

Ryder, Daniel: Breaking the Circle of Satanic Ritual Abuse. Regognizing and Recovering from the Hidden Trauma. CompCare Publishers, Mineapolis: 1992

Ross, Colin A.: Satanic Ritual Abuse. Principles of Treatment. University of Toronto Press, Toronto et al., 2013 (3. edition).

Ross, Colin A.:The C.I.A. Doctors: Human Rights Violations by American Psychiatrists. Manitou Communications, Richardson: 2005

Ross, Colin A.: The CIA and Military Mind Control Research: Building the Manchurian Candidate. Western Clinical Confernce on Trauma and Dissociation, 18. April 1996

Ross, Colin A.: The Osiris Complex. Case-Studies in Multiple Personality Disorder. University of Toronto Press, Toronto et al., 1994

Rutschky, Katharina: Schwarze Pädagogik. Quellen zur Naturgeschichte der bürgerlichen Erziehung. Ullstein, München: 2001

Rutschky, Katharina, Wolff Reinhart: Handbuch sexueller Missbrauch. Ingrid Klein Verlag, Hamburg: 1994

Sanford, Doris: Don’t Make Me Go Back, Mommy: A Child’s Book about Satanic Ritual Abuse (Hurts of Childhood Series)Multnomah Press, Portland: 1990

Sanford, Doris: Helping Kids Through Tough Times. Standard Publishing, Ohio: 1995

Sanford, Doris: Within a Yard of Hell. The Story of an Abnormal Family. Self Publishing: 1995

Salter, Michael: Organised Sexual Abuse. Taylor & Francis Ltd, UK: 2012

Scott, Sara: the politics and experience of ritual abuse beyond disbelief. Open University Press, Buckingham: 2001

Sinason, Valerie: Treating Survivors of Ritual Abuse. Routledge, London: 1994

Smith, Margaret: Ritual Abuse. What it is. Why it happens. How to help. Harper Collings Publishers, New York et al, 1993 (1stedition)

Smith, Margaret: Gewalt und sexueller Mißbrauch in Sekten: wo es geschieht, wie es geschieht und wie man den Opfern helfen kann. Aus dem Amerikan. von Annette Charpentier. Kreuz-Verlag, Zürich: 1994

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: http://whale.to/b/sp/springmeier_h.html

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: Bloodlines of the Illuminati

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: Be wise as serpents

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: The Watchtower & The Masons

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: They Know Not What They Do

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: An Illustrated Guide to Monarch Programming-Mind Control

Springmeier, Fritz & Cisco Wheeler: Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula

“Svali”: Die Illuminaten. Wie der Kult Menschen programmiert. http://www.wahrheit-jetzt.de/Illuminaten.pdf &www.svalispeaks.com

Taylor, Brice: Thanks for the Memories. Brice Taylor Trust: 1999

The Vigilant Citizen Articles Compilation. Discover the Hidden Symbolism found in Music Videos, Movies and Famous Monuments. E-Book, 3rd Edition, May 2014

Van der Hart, Onno, Nijenhuis, Ellert R.S, Steele, Kathy: Das verfolgte Selbst. Strukturelle Dissoziation und die Behandlung chronischer Traumatisierung. Junfermann Verlag, Paderborn 2008.

 


 

[1] Furthermore, italicized contents of this appeal are used to sketch at least brief excerpts from international specialist literature.

 

[2] Compare MK-ed psychologist Barnett, Fiona in her book “Eyes Wide Open” (free download available online)

 

[3] See list of names of perpetrators as short handout (from 2012)

 

[4] Compare “Chronologie einer Vertuschung” (2011-2015)

 

[5] Secret Service officials from Austria, here mostly Mag. Klocker Walter and „Hannes Biegl “, as well numerous intel officials of international agencies are known to the appellant by name and can get examined anytime.

 

[6] “Grandma and Grandpa” Bretterklieber are Walter and Marianne Bretterklieber, both participated in the torture of the toddler Sadegh Dara Rubens in 2011 and were reported as perpetrators at the Vienna Public Prosecutor’s Office in 2011, together with other official family members such as Ing. (HTL) Riegler Helmut Valentin and Riegler Nicole as well their small son Riegler Sebastian. Since January 2019, an application for a review of the actual family circumstances concerning DNA-tests has been submitted to the Graz Ost District Court, as Marianne Bretterklieber (previously Riegler, official birth name Karrer) is not the biological mother of Riegler Andrea. Marianne Bretterklieber, together with her brother Karrer Hans, obviously originates from a post-war Nazi LEBENSBORN institution, with extreme similarity to Jutta Horn (the later wife of the National Socialist Chief of Miracle Weapons, Hans Kammler, née 1901 in Stettin/Germany, now Poland) as, now as far as her brother Hans Karrer is concerned, with Otto Skorzeny (born 1908 in Vienna). Both siblings are thus of unclear – National Socialist – origin, both deeply involved in child trafficking rings including torture/drill and keeping (small) children ready for child trafficking networks. All that is known about Bretterklieber Marianne’s second husband, Bretterklieber Walter, is that he had to grow up without his mother, abandoned by his father, which led to massive disturbances and to an extreme proclivity for using violence against his entire family. As this violence was last known to Sadegh Dara Rubens, it can be assumed that there will be further victims.

 

[7] Teeth, tooth root, gums stand for the warning to remain silent in these satanic ritual perpetrator networks, as well as in MK Ultra networks. The child Sadegh Dara Rubens was obviously “punished” here for naming perpetrators – in specialist literature, children who name perpetrators and networks of perpetrators are called “martyr children” because they are severely punished for failing to obey the order of silence. It is known that such torture scenes are recorded on video and are presented to others for intimidation, and these “punishments” go as far as further partial amputations of the victims’ limbs, which slowly and painfully lead to death. (compare e.g. SNUFF films). Further mutilations of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens are to be foreseen, therefore as of 2011ff danger has been imminent, as the beloved child could be murdered, or triggered to commit suicide, in order to cover traces of the partly top-class perpetrators.

 

[8] After a complaint to the district court BG Graz Ost, the youtube channel was deleted a few days later, but has been copied several times as evidence.

 

[9] The director of the Institute Kutschera, Dr. Kutschera Gundl, was recognized by American and German adults affected by MK Ultra and between the ages of 2 ½ (Sadegh Dara Rubens) and 70 as an “MK Ultra trainer” – perpetrator. The connections of this family clan are extensive, primarily due to the project “Paperclip”, in which former high-ranking National Socialists were able to emigrate to America via the “rat line” after the war, to pursue their criminal – above all, corrosive – operations without interruption. Dr. Kutschera Gundl is also in contact with private American “mercenary companies” and there is an international exchange in the matter of “super soldiers”, as “fully programmed MK Ultra slaves” are referred to as adults. All her three now grown up children are under total MK Ultra programming, as perpetrators.

 

[10] Here it is necessary to state shortly, that psychiatrist Elisabeth Lenzinger is without any doubt highly intelligent. To create the psychiatrically expert opinion in such a horrible quality, shows the Austrian strategy of pretending to be „stupid“- and this strategy of „pretending to be stupid“ is ongoingly staged by Austrian´s courts as well by the district court BG Innere Stadt.

 

[11] For English readers only: Dr. Elisabeth Lenzinger declared Mag. Riegler Andrea as completely lunatic paranoid schizophrenic, ignoring all the evidence the appellant was providing already since 2011ff, ignoring that the appellant was working as a social counselor for the ministry of labor even after the child was “taken”.

 

[12] A complaint against this severely MK-ed psychiatrist, Georg Pakesch, which followed a suggestion to have his children examined over MRT/CT/nuclear medical examination as they are surely victims as well, was answered with a murder assassination in March 2016, after which the appellant had to leave Austria for several months, actually lost her whole existence, besides massive health problems.

 

[13] The head of the court, who has been aware of the Sadegh case most lately since the protests received worldwide in 2015, indirectly tries to ridicule the position of the appellant as a scientist and crown witness. This behavior even more pointedly raises the question of what is going on with the district court BG Innere Stadt, especially considering that even judge candidates working in this court report severe ill-treatment during their training period after years of study, etc. 

 

[14] Thus, while from the postman to the neighbors all are noticing the employees of the authorities who knock at the door, complaints against stalking and microwave radiation in the apartment 1050 Vienna, Margaretengürtel 24-34, as well as assassinations via life-threatening laser attacks on the brain (even if the perpetrators are named) are ignored by the Austrian judiciary, while intelligence service employees are even witnessed by guileless residents in the settlement.

 

[15] In the primary school attended by the child Sadegh Dara Rubens in Hausmannstätten near Graz, a classic MK Ultra school, several children were suffering from (satanic/sadistic) ritual abuse and MK Ultra. The teacher of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens’s class, Mrs. Jutta Matzi, seemed to be handling several MK Ultra children by means of triggers and technical equipment, for further programming on official trips, etc. More details cannot be determined with certainty despite extensive photo and video material, and need a check of police units. The pediatrician of the child Sadegh Dara Rubens, lecturer. Dr. Zotter Heinz from Graz, is closely acquainted with the perpetrator circles: at least, with Dr. Kutschera Jörg (the son of Dr. Kutschera Gundl), whom he recommended as a substitute physician on his pediatrician’s website in 2018/2019. More important, Dr. Zotter Heinz is working as a sleep researcher at the university clinic in Graz, which means he is a MK Ultra programmer with the special field of “psychic driving”, a programming method popular and appreciated in Austria: The concerned children are kept in a kind of deep sleep for days, drugs are sometimes administered, while – depending on the programming of the personality parts – affirmations, etc. are played into their subconscious minds.

 

[16] Here it is important to note in the footnote that intelligent women who are or have been in an MK Ultra program are extremely often – mostly almost always – used as breeders (in German: clumsy to translate as “broodmare”): In addition to pregnancies in their childhood, usually from the age of 8 onwards, the “6-week pregnancies” are also known. The applicant was also used for similar breeding projects; this will be the subject of a separate complaint.

 

[17] Adding to the English version here: In Austria authority officials stress in public main stream media for years, that the courts are overloaded and cannot work efficiently any more. [!]

 

 

Pictures:

Not even 10-year-old beloved Luki Dara Sadegh before and after teeth torture, causing besides other mutilations out of 2011ff now also the loss of – all – his adult teeth (2018/2019):

 

 

Luki Dara Sadegh in 2017/2018 with his adult teeth – now in 2018/2019 without teeth, only with a temporary crown on the stumps of his tooth:

 

 

 

Names of perpetrators brought to court since 2011ff: http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/16.02.2016_Anmahnung_T%C3%A4teranzeigen.pdf

 

Investigation about the connection between the recognized perpetrators, politicians, authority officials, and judges: http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/index.php/chronologie-einer-vertuschung/

 

Update with pictures and biographies asap.

Guidelines for questioning young children in cases of suspected torture

“Now I’m going to tell you a little story. I heard it myself long ago, an old lady told it to me, and I’ve never forgotten it. If I remember rightly, this is how it went:

“I was young at the time when almost all children were often hit. People thought it was necessary to hit them, to make them well-behaved and obedient. All mothers and fathers were supposed to hit their children as soon as they did anything that mothers and fathers thought children shouldn’t do. My little boy, John, was a well-behaved, happy little chap and I didn’t want to hit him. Bu one day, the neighbour came to see me and said that John had been in her strawberry patch and had stolen some strawberries, and that if he did not get a beating he would certainly remain a thief for his whole life. Now, mothers tend to get very frightened and worried when someone comes and complains about their children. And I thought: maybe she’s right, now I really have to give John a beating.

John sat there and played with his building blocks – he was only five years old at the time – when I came in and said that he was going to get a beating and he should go out to cut a switch from a tree himself. John cried as he went. I sat in the kitchen and waited. It took a long time until he came, and he was still crying as he crept in at the door. But he didn’t have a switch with him.

“Mama,” he sobbed, “I couldn’t find a stick, but here is a stone that you can throw!” He handed me a stone, the biggest that he could hold in his hand. Then I began to cry as well, because I suddenly understood what he had thought: “My mummy wants to hurt me and she can do it even better with a stone.” I felt ashamed. And I took him in my arms, and we both cried till we could cry no more, and I thought to myself that I would never, never hit my child. And so that I would never forget it, I took the stone and laid it on a kitchen shelf, where I could see it every day. It lay there a long time, until John grew up. He never became a thief. I would have liked to tell my neighbour, but she had moved away.”

Yes, that is what the old lady said, who told me this when I was still very young. And I still remember thinking to myself: I won’t hit my children either, if I ever have any. I had two children and I never hit them. Despite this, they became good people. And they don’t hit their children either.

Why am I telling you all this? After all, we were supposed to be talking about peace. And how can there be peace in the world if there are no peace-loving people? I think it would be good if a stone lay on the kitchen shelves just about everywhere in the world, as a reminder.”

(Astrid Lindgren: On Peace)

 

This foreword written by Astrid Lindgren describes the reaction of a healthy child and a normal healthy mother. If you have the task of questioning a young child who is showing signs of torture based on the findings of medical MRT/CT/nuclear medical examinations (cf. Istanbul Protocol http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/index.php/istanbul-protokoll-fuer-kleinkinder-bei-folterverdacht/?lang=en/), then you are getting into territory that is not only dark but also deeply pathological and sick.

 

A criminal phenomenon

Signs of torture on the body of your child may indicate that your child is potentially a victim of satanic ritual abuse, also called SRA, or is a “training subject” of trauma-based mind control (MK). SRA can be understood as the combined application of physical, psychological and spiritual assaults. MK is mainly used in the military, intelligence and political areas, although the boundary line between these two forms of abuse is relatively fluid. MK contains an abundance of elaborately devised, complex psychological strategies, ultimately designed to achieve absolute control over the thoughts and feelings of your child. Finally, i.e. at the end of the state-run MK programme, the aim is for your child to be conditioned to such an extent that he/she can be ordered to carry out actions that go against his/her human nature, when “wearing” different fragmented personalities (or “alters”) that are artificially created through torture, ideally without being able to remember carrying out those actions. The means employed to achieve that final state are physical, sexual, psychological and emotional torture. The ability and declared willingness of the perpetrators to subject their child to these kinds of mistreatment and abuse, when ordered to do so by the state, is what distinguishes this group of people from all other living beings on our planet. State-organised torturers are not interested in publicising their criminal actions, which go completely unpunished. MK torture perpetrated on a young child is not the result of a superstitious belief in witchcraft: it is consciously and deliberately planned, organised and continuously perfected. There is basically no part of your child’s body for which a “suitable” torture method does not exist. There is no element (water, air, fire and earth), no ideology and no tool that cannot be used for torturing your child. Clear your mind of the propagandistic falsehoods propagated by western (criminal) cartel media that the torture of young children is only practiced in designated “rogue states”.

These crimes are of course kept secret. This is why it is ultimately very hard to find a definition that covers the “programming” of your child. Survivors describe it as an act designed to activate physical and psychological reactions to external stimuli. A person conditioned in this way is intended to finally be able to react in an intended way after receiving an auditory, visual or tactile signal (trigger), ideally without noticing anything about it themselves. If the conditioning brought about through torture is successful, the political system or network will have raised the perfect mental slave who carries out orders, without conscience and against all the standards of successful ethical coexistence. As the violence-induced raising of such a multiple personality ultimately involves the most serious violations imaginable of the child’s legal rights, in this area of crime the scientific overlaps between psychology, medicine, social sciences, philosophy, criminology and criminalistics are relatively fluid.

This final construction of a multiple personality outlined above is closely linked to the use of hypnosis. In the respective procedural modules, the programmers used, who are usually conventionally trained physicians, generate a torture-induced, selective intensification of perception in the child victim, whose attention in this respect is ratcheted up through the assaults. Due to the strained attentiveness thus induced, the child’s real state of awareness is clouded. In systematic collaboration, the psychopathic perpetrators described above open a way into the child’s mind by controlling his/her perceptions and memory, and by creating false memories. At the end of several years’ programming, the subject is able to obey like an automaton, receives all instructions uncritically and without question, and can carry out complex orders requiring a high intelligence, but is usually not aware of it all. In order to prevent people who are, from humanitarian motives, on the side of the tortured child from glimpsing the perfidious structures of the state-run torture programmes, false memories are implanted in the child victim and posthypnotic reaction patterns are instilled in order to produce false statements. This is why you should not be surprised if, when asked about the complex sequence of abuse, your child either maintains a consistent silence or behaves in a completely irrational way. The network of perpetrators is fully aware that, due to the ethnic heterogeneity of the police force, at least some police employees would not be indifferent to these severe violations of victims’ legal rights. Even though fully initiated perpetrators within the police ultimately cover up this abuse and actively work to prevent convictions, to begin with the „Police“ organisation is simply too big for the group of perpetrators to control. One cannot therefore rule out the possibility that, when you initially report the offence to the police, you may get a criminal investigator who takes the concerns of the protecting parent seriously. The more importance this officer accords to the parent’s report, the more quickly they will implement urgent measures to search for and secure clues and to determine the evidence. During this important phase, the ring of perpetrators is not yet able to attain ultimate control of the course of the proceedings. Therefore the perpetrators’ strategy must be to implant the suggestion in the police investigator’s mind, through conditioning the child, that the child or the protecting parent is suffering from mental illness. Where fathers are the protecting parent, a suspicion is usually fabricated that the father is the perpetrator. However, SRA or MK can only be carried out by groups of perpetrators, i.e. by several people, as a single individual could never manage to do it. Usually, these protecting parents are quickly separated from the children concerned – without securing evidence of any kind – in order to remove further traces and to falsify the overall impression, and the young child continues to be used without hindrance – usually lifelong.

The following serve as torture methods before the programme units (quoted from Ellen Lacter, 2017):

  • Rape: vaginal, anal rape, group rape, using sharp objects, weapons, etc.
  • Filming the torture
  • Verbal cruelty, mockery, making child ridiculous, laughing and enthusiasm as reactions to the pain and terror of the victim
  • Hanging the victim up, including with the head hanging downwards, in stress positions, during which they are tortured by spinning, etc.
  • Being fully immersed in water tanks filled with ice
  • Being buried alive with insects, snakes, rats, etc. with an oxygen source that is controlled by the perpetrators
  • Being hung up above fire or extreme heat
  • Extreme thirst and hunger
  • Leaving the victim in urine, excrement and vomit
  • Being forced to ingest poisonous substances
    Control of the victim’s surroundings – painfully hot or cold, dark or intensely bright, being
  • bombarded with loud noise, etc.
  • Mutilation, e.g. removing nails or fingers
  • Removal of body organs and dismemberment of victims kept in complete captivity (Ellen Lacter, 2017)

 

All the information that the victim receives during these torture sessions (“programming”) is stored in his/her deeper psychobiological levels. Therefore, pay close attention to such statements when questioning the child. One special feature of this crime, not just from the aspect of children’s statement psychology, is that it will be suggested to the child that the adults are able to access his/her body at any time and/or to control the individual environment – and this often corresponds to the unimaginable truth:

Besides the known monitoring technologies in the child’s household, persons are also placed in the child’s immediate vicinity in order to develop a professed emotional relationship with him/her. As soon as this has been firmly established and the child can be successfully deceived into trusting that person, the child is then betrayed. The subsequent messages are clear and unambiguous: “We know everything about you”, “You have betrayed us”, “You won’t escape us”. Other “game versions” involve the child’s being told that an all-hearing microphone has been implanted in his/her tooth, or even a bomb in the stomach, which can explode in the event of betrayal. Adult victims have in fact been able to ascertain the presence of real, i.e. (in)active, implants through conventional medical examinations. Nowadays there is in fact the possibility of ensuring that dementia sufferers or animals can be found by means of (electromagnetic) pulse-controlled implants. An additional – though still less researched – aspect is the assumption that parts of MK programming as well as the use of triggers can meanwhile be carried out via microwaves and radiofrequencies.

As the silence of the young child involved is so important in terms of criminal law, the techniques to ensure it are practically innumerable: threats that their beloved primary caregiver (usually the mother) will be killed; needles in the area of the gums as a “training in keeping silent”; and wiping conscious memories through deliberately caused concussion, electroshock treatment and psychoactive medication. An additional way of ensuring silence is the showing of the pretended or actual liquidation of a “traitor”. Above all, witnessing a real murder makes a particularly devastating impression on the child. Killings in the context of so-called “snuff pornography” (filmed torture, followed by the death of the victim) are also used for this purpose. It is likewise known that it is suggested to the young children that they have killed a person or else – far more dramatic for the child’s psyche – they have actually been forced to kill someone.

It is thus very easy to understand that you can only achieve a comprehensive account of all these circumstances with endless patience and absolute, benevolent neutrality. The child must deal with his/her shame about the fact that it has been the victim of a series of the most unimaginable acts of emotional, mental and physical violence and has thus displayed accompanying physical reactions and emotions, that no one has helped and that he/she was even laughed at by the group of perpetrators. These things have formed part of the child’s everyday experience. It is therefore your task to remain completely neutral during the questioning process.

Never forget the punishment with which the child has been threatened if he/she speaks out, which usually involves the murder of the primary caregiver or torture. The process of questioning the child must basically be done in several stages, and must therefore be planned to take place over a period of several months. As the investigators are generally left to their own resources when working out the course of the abuse as a whole, they must organise the questioning sessions themselves. If investigators know people with knowledge of criminology knowledge in their personal or professional circle (police detectives, juvenile court representatives, lawyers specialising in criminal law), these can of course be consulted and/or brought in too.

The person concerned must be clear in their mind about what they may ultimately be getting into. Regarding doing it oneself: even a poorly planned questioning session is better than leaving the child alone with the abuse.

Although MK/SRA as a criminal phenomenon has, for obvious reasons, not been made a specific subject of study in criminological research up to now, its individual torture methods have been. Sexual violence perpetrated on a child in a private context has meanwhile been relatively well studied. Because the sexual abuse is a cornerstone in the process of programming the child, one can therefore use it as a starting point. It is of course important to have an idea of the basic process of questioning a child victim before you start. Nevertheless, the essential difference here is that a child who has been through SRA/MK has undergone unimaginable torture with the aim of splitting their personality. The essential elements of this crime are therefore briefly described below:

 

Phenomenon of the split personality

The simplest form of split personality consists of a normal state (A) and the hypnotically controlled state (B).

 

Below: Visible change of personality in a child who is secretly enrolled a torture programme.

Source: “Luki” Dara Sadegh on a supervised visit to his mother Mag. Andrea Sadegh 2013: Change of personality within 10 seconds. Assumed posthypnotic command: “Whenever you’re near your mother, remember what you’ve done and said: if she knew, she wouldn’t love you anymore.”

The change of the child’s personality is based on a posthypnotic command or a trigger. To do this, planning, a trigger and implementation are needed. An effectively instilled posthypnotic command is not aimed just at generating the outward behaviour of the subject – it also has to create inner mental states in the controlled human tool. Using inculcated key stimuli or codes, it is possible to condition complex operative sequences. The programmer can thereby also command the victim to forget the key signal again as soon as they have carried out the ordered action. This method is intended to undermine the police investigation of the crime outlined above. An additional obfuscation strategy is what is called “posthypnotic amnesia”. Here, the contents of the child’s memory are fragmented through mentally traumatising the child. This perfidious tactic is deemed successful if an outsider does not notice that the victim’s memory is impaired. To achieve this, during the child’s programming the method of fear-based suggestion is used. One technique is to plant the idea that they have a headache when they are inwardly processing the abuse suffered that day.

 

Below: A child mentally processing the abuse suffered that day – a headache induced by suggestion, also called a “splitting headache”.

Source: “Luki” Dara Sadegh, taken by his mother Mag. Andrea Sadegh, in the summer of 2011, when the child had suffered the first flashbacks.

An observable headache can also be the result of an artificially induced neurosis, consisting of inculcated guilt or inferiority complexes intended to prevent the child from talking about their experiences.

 

Why is it done at such a young age?

Due to their highly imaginative minds, children can be more easily influenced than adults. In order to prevent prosecution, perpetrators exploit the fact that due to their still limited vocabulary, the child does not feel able to talk about the abusive assaults. Through the MK programming techniques a number of separate identities, called “alters”, are generated in the child. The group of perpetrators that installs, activates and controls these alters can ultimately also communicate with the respective individual alters. So that the child is outwardly able to cope with their everyday life, in addition to the alters, an “apparently normal personality” (ANP) must also be in place. The ANP is, so to speak, the facade for the programmed individual’s future role in the social system. The ANP, functioning as an outer shell, ensures that the multiple personalities finally remain hidden to non-initiates.

If investigators try to get the child to open up by showing him/her affection, a word of warning: perpetrators will deliberately create associations between natural interpersonal actions (kissing, caressing) or words (“love”, pet names, etc.) and dark threats against the child. You must therefore reckon with triggers deliberately implanted in the child to ensure that they are mentally imprisoned by an “inner guard” and their constant fear of the consequences of being a “traitor” i.e. of speaking the truth. The same applies to conditioning and hypnosis in connection with the initial routine procedures in a criminal investigation. In the presence of someone urgently suspected of being involved in the abuse, the child may for example in greet that person with joyful eagerness, while simultaneously rejecting their actual persons of trust, usually the protecting parent. Since enormous financial resources are available for the programming process, props, magic tricks, stage plays, special effects, film screenings, cameras and microphones are also used. The manipulation of the child’s thoughts is activated by means of roleplay and characters from fairy-tales or other adventure worlds (extra-terrestrials, demons). These are stored in the child’s mind linked to certain colours: i.e., during the programme unit concerned, the perpetrators show themselves to the child in identical costumes and colours. Thus, in time, it is possible to forge cross-connections in the mind of the child victim, which are accessible to the programmer through codes. For you, as an outsider, these are usually completely innocuous, everyday words or other triggers. Nevertheless, the child is prepared in such a way that, in the end, the “opening and closing” of the child’s personalities function appropriately. This process is considered successful if the trigger words have a certain rhythm and the treacherous word combination or other trigger chains are selected in such a way that an everyday situation cannot trigger a change of personality.

Multiple personality disorder (MPD), also called “dissociative identity disorder” (DID) is used in the international system for classifying illnesses (ICD 10), in this case concerning the psychiatric illnesses (DSM4). It would thus be a punishable offence for the perpetrator to deliberately create a sick person twice over (knowing the prohibition on simultaneous intention to perpetrate a crime and succeeding in perpetrating that crime). Consequently, there is a causal connection between dysfunctional family integration, the use of violence, mental trauma and disorders when processing experiences. It is thereby necessary for the child to be placed in the hands of the programmers at regular interviews. The above-described mental trauma of the child is devised based on a process of “internally running away”. Since the physically much weaker child is unable to justifiably defend itself against the assaults and can also see no way of physically escaping from the location of the abuse, it must finally choose the path of mental dissociation. The rule of thumb here is: “The earlier the traumatisation of the child occurs, the greater the probability of multiple personality disorder.” A decisive point is thereby the extent of control over the child’s defence mechanisms. In the specialist literature, one finds different instructions as to the most suitable time for this. After dissociation and violent training, children aged two and a half can already display a completely split personality. Under the supervision of a physician, tortures such as pinching fingers with pincers, violent blows to the head, rapes, and having fingers painfully trapped in a mousetrap while being locked in a room, etc. As soon as the child stops crying and is only whimpering in pain, it is released. Then the child receives their aversion conditioning through commands. Not all stages are the same here. Meanwhile, the following main programming procedures are known:

 

Alpha: Basic programme – the aims are the unresisting obedience and automatic reflexes of the child

Beta: Sexual programme activated by a key word

Delta: Assassin programme, fighter programme

Theta: Programme for integration in occult groups

Omega: Obscuration programme with the aim of maintaining the split psyche of the child

 

A typical technical method for creating multiple personalities is “spin programming”, “spinning” or the German term Rädern which (appropriately enough) means “being broken on the wheel”. The child is strapped to a rotating disc, and through extremely painful centrifugal forces, their personalities are polyfragmented. This kind of programming method already begins in earliest childhood. The child can either be spun on their own axis – as on a spit – or turned in a vertical direction.

Here too, one must of course take the rapid development of new technical possibilities into account. Seizure-inducing treatments, CT, as well as the influencing of the mind by means of electromagnetic fields are used here, and are still relatively little researched in relation to young children. The special feature is basically that the programming of the child relates to the generating of personality fragments. Therefore, a specific message is always conveyed to the child during programming. While being questioned, the child may thus give you answers that appear completely incoherent. The same applies if you thereby observe illogical ways of behaving. However, when you become more familiar with them, these are always connected to commands instilled through violence:

  • You deserve to be punished – we’ll find you wherever you are
  • No one believes what you say
  • You deserve the violence you have experienced
  • We’re watching you and can kill your parents
  • The police will come to get you – you’ll go to prison

 

Subsequently building on this, in the next stage the victim is usually indoctrinated with the following ideas (cf. Ellen Lacter, 2017):

  • You are evil.
  • You are a murderer.
  • You are an accomplice in crimes (often such scenes are filmed as evidence).
  • You are now one of us.
  • You are now a voluntary member of the network which commits rapes and abuse.
  • No one except us will ever want to have anything to do with you again.
  • The people who have been taking care of you can’t take care of you ever again.
  • No psychotherapist will ever want to help you.
  • The whole of the clergy will condemn you.
  • You are lost in the sight of God.
  • You now belong to: _____ (a god/goddess that demands blood sacrifices).

 

Certainly, the most ruthless method is brain surgery. Here, the surgeon deliberately damages the healthy tissue of the healthy child. Another possibility is medically influencing the amygdala (the part of the brain important for emotions and feelings) using electrical current. Other surgical interventions (scars on the brain stem, etc.), and the removal and mutilation of glands, are also known methods.

The child often remembers the torture in everyday life in flashbacks, usually triggered by associations while processing the experience. It can thereby quite possibly happen that the child reveals the abuse at this very moment: the young child experiences the torture as if it is happening again.

First of all, some good news: as soon as they have been able to relate one of the events in their entirety, the young child finds greater peace of mind: in every flashback or anxiety state, and in every recounting of the abuse, you are already helping the children to heal their unimaginable experiences to a great extent.

Finding out about the torturers’ world represents a particular challenge for you, but is everyday routine for the children, as is the often-staged, seemingly “fairytale-like” world of Satanism: Satanic rituals and the procedures conducted in an MK programme can definitely overlap. According to Michaela Huber (1995), victims have reported the following methods:

  • Strange smells […]
  • Men in black coats/cloaks, hoods, masks, etc.;
  • Cellars, painted black or their walls hung with black cloths;
  • […]
  • Rituals with oil, blood […]
  • Blood, that runs down one’s naked body […]
  • Eating raw animal or human flesh, or faeces, drinking urine and blood
  • […]
  • Vaginal, oral, anal gang rape; being penetrated with sticks, knives, crucifixes, etc.
  • Blows, kicks, electric shocks
  • Being locked in chests, coffins, water-tanks, etc.;
  • […]
  • Loud, sacral or Wagnerian music, “sacral” chanting […]
  • Extreme feelings of shame and guilt, the feeling of having to “sacrifice” oneself or of “being chosen to die”, to feel like “Satan” (or having “inner alters” who think they are Satan)
  • A vow that cannot be broken, otherwise someone will die (either they themselves or someone close to them, or their favourite animal)
  • The exaction of punishments upon them and/or other children or adults who have been “disobedient”
  • Invocations and curses; the feeling of being able to be killed by the words of a spell, etc.

 

 

Before starting a questioning session, you should therefore bear in mind the following patterns of reaction, which the child has already able to show an investigator or protecting parent on occasion in the past:

  • Fear of giving blood samples, and of dental examinations
  • Fear of being tied up
  • Ritualistic chanting
  • Nervousness at meals (cocoa: faeces; red fruit-juice: blood; barbecues in summer: burns/scalding)
  • Wanton destruction of toy figures and dolls (mutilations)
  • Fear of “harmless” everyday objects
  • etc.

 

The questioning session

Questioning young children is an essential skill in cases of suspicion of torture: it is made very clear to children through a wide variety of tortures, extreme drills and threats that they should never, ever talk about what has happened and never name names. The perpetrator networks are very aware of that particular danger and have usually infiltrated city-centre facilities such as child help centres, and medical, psychiatric and therapeutic services, to prevent possible further examinations of the child, and to usually forcibly remove the child from its protective primary care-giver (usually the mother, but in some cases also the father). If, after already having invested in a particular child, the torture of the child becomes visible due to injuries or flashbacks, the loss of the child to the perpetrator networks not only involves the risk that parts of the recognised and named network will be severely prosecuted under criminal law, but also means a massive financial loss. As the perpetrators of these networks have as a rule themselves gone through these kinds of torture-based programmes as young children, it is easy to verify this in the case of adults too, by means of radiological technologies like MRT/CT/nuclear medical examinations, based on unmistakeable characteristics (incapacity to empathise, dissociative tendencies, scars on the brain stem, etc.).

 

Triggers during questioning

Before asking questions, you need to be aware that touch triggers may have been implanted in the child: you should therefore be careful with touching and only touch the child with his/her permission. The most well-known here is the silence touch: for this painful lesson, the child is first encouraged to chatter. The child is then given an electric shock, or pricked in the gums or in the tongue. Another method is to use a silence trigger that is activated through stroking the child. It should thus be no surprise if, after being caressed or receiving any affection, immediately clams up towards the other person. Further triggers, which perpetrator networks often like using are pressure (stress, strict voice, accusing look, hand signs). Take care to ensure that your body language is congruent and explain to the child if anything irritates you. Openness, truth and – most importantly – the absolute benevolent neutrality of the investigator are the only way to attain reliable results.

Later on, two cameras will be needed: one camera should point at the child and the other at the questioner. Ideally, there should be a third camera filming you both from above (bird’s eye view). There is footage from the sadly notorious Hampstead case in which the police investigator, who offers behavioural training on a private basis, triggers the children during the “questioning session” using hand signs, see below:

Source and summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSOa6Siko-8

 

It is therefore essential that you remain neutral, no matter what you may hear or experience during the questioning session. Give the child as much space and freedom as possible during the interview: any pressure can put the child into states of fear and anxiety, and thus cause them to clam up or to feed you “well-rehearsed stories”.

 

Video recordings

As a general rule, every questioning session should be recorded on video: it is important to ensure that the physical reactions are also recorded – both those of the investigator and the child. The same applies if a question causes the child to suffer a flashback. For the purpose of giving evidence, it is therefore important to find out and record whether and how the flashback corresponds to the question posed. Take time to think about what you have heard. Don’t rule out any hypothesis and don’t be afraid of not being able to calm the child after a flashback: the only unforgivable mistake you can make is to abandon the child to the perpetrator network. If the questioning session is filmed, both the continuation of the session after the child has “calmed down” and a fully documented flashback have value as evidence. Bear in mind that all the recorded injuries (Istanbul Protocol) should be addressed and investigated in the interview.

 

A short digression: Personal evidence and material evidence

The evidentiary value of the child’s statement can vary; here is an overview:

A: Personal evidence

Personal evidence can come from the statement of a court-appointed expert, an accused party/defendant or a witness (your child).

 

B: Material evidence

Material evidence can consist of a document or what is called a “piece of visual evidence”. The document is a physical declaration of ideas and intentions (e.g. a written document). The piece of visual evidence contains no ideas, but may enable certain conclusions to be drawn (e.g. if the investigator finds an object used to commit the offense based on the child’s statement).

The reason that the material evidence is so important is because, detached from the series of criminal actions, it speaks for itself and enables non-involved people to draw conclusions about the course of the abuse and the perpetrators involved. The material evidence is thus basically objective and is therefore given preference over personal evidence in court. Although it is true that it can be checked using scientific methods, it can however yield a false trail to probative facts due to mistakes in securing evidence, in examinations, storage and analysis. Personal evidence is basically subjectively influenced. You should therefore try to check the truth of the child’s statements and to diligently follow up any indications given by the child as to potential material evidence. Questioning the child should make it easier for you to, for example:

  • identify suspects
  • determine that perpetrators belong to a group
  • reconstruct the assaults
  • seek/secure evidence

 

Legal information

If you subject the child to questioning, this is a private investigative procedure, not an official interrogation/hearing. In an official interrogation/hearing, the questioner is there in an official capacity, states the fact and makes a formal request for information required by the authorities.

As already explained, you should video all questioning sessions with the child from two, and ideally from three angles. After each questioning session you should transcribe the entire contents. You should ensure that in every questioning session you have at least one witness of good repute and good standing. Make suitable backup copies of every video recording and written record. [!] In addition, depending whether the laws in the country concerned permit it, the witness should consider making use of the possibility of affirmation in lieu of an oath. The video recording should document the complete conversation and also portray all the non-verbal reactions of the child – including you yourself. The questioning process itself should not be interrupted. Place the child in such a way that they can definitely be clearly seen in the video. The arms, hands and feet must also be fully visible. Take the necessary lighting conditions into account and switch off your mobile phone. Avoid being disturbed by third parties (put a “Don’t disturb” on the door). Make sure that the child has had enough sleep and has had a proper meal beforehand. If several children have potentially been abused, they should be questioned separately from one another.

 

Checklist & procedure

Don’t simply ask questions in an unmethodical way: instead, draw up a checklist beforehand. In cases of sexual assault, no individual questioning session should last longer than 30 minutes; any breaks should be documented. When questioning in cases of SRA or MK, follow your intuition, and also let the question last longer. You need to be aware that you are certainly not going to be able to clear up such a complex cluster of actions in a short time. Also, be aware that if perpetrator networks continue to assault the child, the child can be prepared relatively easily for 30-45 minutes, i.e. deliberately prepared.

All the important facts should then be worked through point by point. The checklist should contain the essential points, such as:

  • What is already known about the assaults, times of the abuse and perpetrators?
  • Driving routes to the scene of the abuse, means of transporting the child, instruments used in the abuse?
  • What patterns of injury have been ascertained in the visual examination of the child (Istanbul Protocol)?

 

Besides the specific characteristics of the case of a child in an MK programme, there are also basic features which apply to all child victims. Children are often taciturn and use short sentences. When putting the questions, you should therefore also take into account the child’s style of talking and linguistic deficiencies – which are often due to the complex trauma suffered. The statements display lack of vocabulary, and often lacks analogies and metaphors due to its lack of life experience. It is therefore possible that, in the course of assimilating the experience and in accordance with their mental capacity, the child describes an offense by referring to a familiar process (“he wetted” for ejaculation). If you ask the child intimate questions, explain in advance why it is necessary. The child still has a play world, which is not compatible with adult logic, while conversely adult logic can hardly grasp the experiences of the child. A child’s speech comprehension first starts to slowly develop after about 24 months. The child thereby believes that all actions and processes are purposeful (“The weather will be nice if I eat all the food on my plate”). Small children are unable to intentionally lie, as they lack the necessary cognitive preconditions to do this. If the child is not able to give you information on the chronology of events, objects, descriptions of people and distances, this is not a lie. It also does not yet have any pubescent self-interest, such as the desire for revenge or craving for recognition. Remember that the group of perpetrators likewise use a “fantasy vocabulary”, especially with young children – ask questions to clarify any expressions that are not clear to you.

It may of course also happen that, during a questioning session, a child from an MK programme will give you the false answers that have been instilled in them through violence, or from time to time reveals inauthentic reaction patterns. Nevertheless, because of their age, the child cannot consistently maintain this “myth”. Always bear in mind the child’s conditioned conflicts of loyalty and fear of punishment. The child may therefore refuse questions or give evasive answers. Make use of the child’s impulse to play. The use of children’s picture books and story cubes can likewise be very helpful in questioning sessions, particularly with children who are already “keeping quiet”.

 

Source: Andrea Sadegh – “Story Cubes from © Gigamic” (2017)

 

Beyond the imaginable

Even if a child describes an injury that you failed to see in the prior visual examination (compare the Istanbul Protocol http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/index.php/istanbul-protokoll-fuer-kleinkinder-bei-folterverdacht/?lang=en), you have no reason to doubt the truth of that information. Bear in mind that you must react by exploring new directions in accordance with a statement from the child (looking for the crime scene, searching for clues and evidence). Always remember that you can still find clues that you have overlooked in your immediate surroundings. Also, bear in mind that there are no limits to the evil imagination of the torturers. Thus, in the Sadegh case, the two-and-a-half-year-old child suffered massive flashbacks on seeing a toilet brush. In time, it emerged that the child had not been hit with it but had been anally penetrated with the handle. You should therefore never interrupt the flow of the child’s narrative: if need be, after documenting the questioning session, bring in an expert who specialises in SRA or MK, and also text researchers can be extremely helpful in putting the parts of the story into the right order, especially in the case of young children.

 

Forensic analysis of traces: a brief summary

Traces/clues are material objects and physical changes at the macro and micro levels. These arise through the series of actions perpetrated and can make it possible to reach conclusions about the perpetrators and their modus operandi. If there is no connection between a material change and the incident relevant to the crime, we speak of a false trail. However, when dealing with MK, you must reckon with changes that have been deliberately brought about. What one is dealing with in such a case is a fake clue, rather than a false trail. Clues that are significant with regard to child torture can be:

Evidence of a crime: That is, traces produced due to the criminal activities at the scene of the crime, and found either on the child themselves or on the perpetrator. Such traces can make it easier for you to reconstruct the course of the abuse. Some examples of this are, for example, defensive injuries on the child, or traces of secretions and blood connected to the abuse described by the child.

Traces of perpetrators: These are traces that the perpetrator has left on the instruments of abuse, on the child or at the scene of the crime (sperm, blood, vaginal secretions, hairs, textile fibres).

Traces are created interactively. You have to start from the assumption that the perpetrators will also find these traces.

 

Traces of blood:

“Blood is a special juice.” This statement has a special meaning in criminalistics. The special aspect is that the characteristics of human blood are preserved and are passed on genetically in accordance with the laws of nature, and that blood is serologically detectable and classifiable. After leaving the body, blood is at risk of being destroyed from bacteria, moulds and environmental influences. The analysability of a blood spot therefore gets more and more limited as time goes on. Blood rapidly changes colour and is therefore difficult to see. Nevertheless, even in the case of minute amounts, it is possible to prove in a laboratory that a substance found is in fact blood. Human blood has unalterable characteristics.

One such characteristic is the statistical classification in accordance with blood groups. The so-called ABO system is used for this purpose.

A: 44%

B: 11%

AB: 5%

O: 40%

 

A blood spot can thus be used to narrow the investigation down to a particular suspect as against other people with different blood groups. After the child makes a statement, it is therefore important to secure the specific instrument used for the abuse or their clothing. As, according to this elimination system, you are holding a means to single out a potential suspect from other persons, the blood spot enables considerably more, based on the DNA evidence. The DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) contains the genetic information of the suspect. This particularly applies if you discover blood or sperm on the child’s body immediately after an assault. The probability of the chromosomal pattern of the DNA of two people being the same is less than 1 to 30 billion. For this reason, if several traces of a suspect’s DNA are found, the chances of being wrong basically become immeasurably small. It is now also possible to identify the DNA from hair roots and vaginal secretions.

A laboratory analysis can differentiate between the gender and origin of the blood (blood from the nose or anus). As in MK Ultra torture sessions, dogs can also be deployed as an instrument to abuse the children, a blood spot could also stem from a dog. It is likewise possible to differentiate between human and animal blood in a laboratory (using the so-called “Uhlenhaut method”). In addition to securing the trace carrier, while keeping it as sterile and germ-free as possible, you should first take a photograph of the trace (close-up, giving scale of length).

 

As the torture of the child encompasses the aspects of humiliation and degradation, you must also expect to possibly find traces of urine. The presence of urine is verified through the concentration of urea in the trace. However, larger quantities are needed for an examination. Verification is done on a microscopic and biochemical basis.

Sexual torture can result in traces of the saliva of a suspect being found. Here, verification is carried out through the enzyme ptyalin produced in the body. Following an assault, despite subsequently washing the child, saliva can nonetheless remain clinging to the child’s mucosal cells.

In actuality, there is no limit to the circumstances under which the hairs and flakes of skin of a suspect can remain or be transferred. Even if you thoroughly wash the child after the torture. Through microscopic examinations and biological comparisons, it is possible to distinguish human hairs from hair-like wool fibres and synthetic fibres. By way of qualification, it must be said that it is generally not possible to definitely allocate hairs to a perpetrator. However, it is a different matter if the found hair combines special attributes such as, for example, pathological changes through fungal infestation or residues of care products. However, it is possible to determine whether it fell out naturally or was torn out violently by magnifying the detachment point of a hair. This would be significant in cases where children are dragged along the floor by the hair or when the hair on the head is pulled violently.

Besides human traces, there is also the possibility of finding textile fibres. This includes plant fibres (cotton), animal fibres (wool), mineral fibres (glass fibres) and chemical fibres (nylon). The transfer of fibres in fact takes place everywhere every day. Above all, textile fibres are characterised by great durability. Such fibres are extremely tenacious and can hardly ever be completely removed. Studies (e.g. Aldermasten/GBR) show that about 80% of all fibres transferred from other people are lost within 48 hours. The rest continue to stick tenaciously. After every questioning session, you should therefore compare the child’s statements and check whether any corresponding trace carriers can be found and/or which people the child names to you as suspects.

 

Questioning intervals and techniques

Even if you question the child at intervals, you should not interrupt the video recording – otherwise the perpetrators would easily be able to say that you may have manipulated the child. Bear in mind that due to the torture suffered, the child was limited in its cognitive ability, was probably dissociated or that his/her personality may already be split. Unlike normal perception, the human brain stores traumatic events in an unordered memory fragment. You therefore have to constantly adjust your discoveries about the course of the abuse, depending on the situation.

You need to help the child understand that they are not being forced to take part in the questioning. It should be clear that they should only report what they have actually experienced.

Example:

“Now, before you tell me anything, you can just quietly think about what you would like to say. It is important that you tell me the truth. But it’s okay if you can’t say something. You can simply tell me that you don’t know.”

Show the child that you are extremely interested in them and help them to sharpen their capacity for remembering places, people and activities.

Examples:

“Have you ever been to the Christmas market? –Oh, you were there last year.”

 

This helps to strengthen the child’s perceptions regarding a particular place.

“Were any other people with you at the Christmas market?”

“Aha, so you were at the Christmas market with Granny.”

“What does your Granny look like? – Aha, so Granny has glasses and short hair.”

This helps the child to focus their attention on a person more sharply.

“What did you do together at the Christmas market? – Wow cool, so you sat in a fire engine! But Granny didn’t? No, she’s already much too old. You’re right! Wouldn’t it be funny if grannies always came with the fire brigade? – Do you know all about what the fire brigade does? And did you even have candyfloss? So when do you always get candyfloss or other sweets?”

This helps to increase the child’s attention regarding activities. At this point, you should already focus on building a positive relationship with the child. Describing familiar surroundings, people and activities like this helps the child to feel more secure for the subsequent questioning about the scene of the abuse, the suspects and the abuse itself.

You can now begin to ask about the abuse. Try to get the child to describe the scene of the abuse, the abuse itself and the suspects as precisely as possible. Take time for this.

You should never pre-formulate answers for the child; never make any assumptions.

“So then X lay down on you and painfully forced his penis into your anus?” – A young child would never make such a statement.

You should also ask what the child means when it is describing the abuse and the respective body parts.

Examples:

“What do you mean when you say ‘his wee-wee’?”

“What do you mean when you say ‘he did a banana in my botty’?”

“What do you mean when you say ‘wet and hit’?”

 

Make sure that you do not give the child any information that it has not already disclosed. Nevertheless, you should stick to the initial subject in your questions. Avoid conditioning the child and always be sparing with praise, maintaining a benevolently neutral but appreciative attitude.

It is up to you how you create a good relationship with the child. Here are some examples for how to build a relationship:

“What kind of children’s films do you watch on TV?”

“What’s your favourite toy?”

“Are you already going to Kindergarten?”

 

Then you can slowly get round to talking about the abuse.

“Can you tell me why you have such bad dreams?”

Avoid posing suggestive questions, even if you already have some idea of the basic underlying situation. The child should be permitted to formulate statements by themselves and independently.

 

Examples:

Neutral questions: Such questions are free of implied suspicion: the child is not being fed any answers.

What? Where? How? How often? Who?

 

Contrary questions: Although such questions have a suggestive drift, in the end you can hardly be accused of having influenced the child.

“Did Mrs K say that you are allowed to tell your Mummy all about it?” (When you sense a command to keep silent)

“But how could X touch you there – after all, you had your trousers on, didn’t you?” (When you assume that the child had to take its clothes off.)

 

Multiple-choice questions: These enable you to narrow down the facts.

“Were you standing, sitting or lying down?”

“Was it on the bed or on the sofa?”

 

Leading questions (these are suggestive and should be avoided):

“So then X strangled you with the belt round your neck in the car?”

 

Use additional phrases to underpin important statements. Or use a counter-probe through counter-suggestion.

“I didn’t quite understand that bit. Can you explain it to me a little more exactly?”

 

If you reach a point where the child can betray their emotions, there is a risk of an emotional outburst or a flashback. At this point, you have two possible solutions to this. As you are recording the questioning session on video, the filmed flashback does of course have appropriate value as evidence. Or you can immediately distract the child and behave as if you haven’t noticed their state of agitation.

One possibility: The child is just about to burst into tears. You react as follows:

“There was something I absolutely wanted to ask you. You did tell me that you like playing with your Indian castle. Have you got some little Indians to play with? – Really? Lots and lots? You must show them to me some time!”

 

Pose the questions in such a way that you always have as complete a picture as possible of every single assault. Do not move on to the next incident of abuse until you have completely finished questioning the child about a course of events. You should thereby bear in mind that the child needs to be given the space and freedom to open up and talk about it.

 

Something else you should observe is also the way that the child may show the abuse in actions. This is certainly due to their inability to express the abuse in words, but also corresponds to the way that children relive experiences. So it may also happen that instead of making a statement, the small witness displays a physical position, a series of movements or accompanying mimicry. Make use of this childlike characteristic.

 

Example:

“Could you show me how X hit you?”

 

With questions as to the guilt of a suspect, the child can get into difficulties. A statement like “It was him” is not sufficient here. The child must be able to describe characteristics specific to the person. You should therefore try to get as accurate as possible a description of the person. The same applies to the times and durations of the abuse. You have to help the child here. As you proceed, you can show the child photos of different people, including suspected perpetrators.

Remember that being able to “recognise” perpetrators again has become essential for the survival of the young children: as a rule, these children recognise every detail of the torturers again and can also – depending on their age – describe them. In the Sadegh case, when looking through private photographs, the two-and-a-half-year-old child immediately recognised a former acquaintance of the mother and cried: “Kind! Kind!” and was pleasantly surprised to see that person again in a photo on her laptop. In answer to the question “Hey – that’s great! What kind thing did A do that makes you so excited, darling?” “She told Farrokh to stop. Stop. When it was ouchy.” – No doubt, Ms. A had been present at (at least) one torture ritual and had intervened. Although such complex procedures as these can be faked to deceive a young child, one cannot suggest such a series of events to a child of this age through programming.

 

Created/programmed confusion

When the child makes the simplest statements such as “my Mummy/my Daddy” or “my Granny/my Grandpa”, check who the child is talking about: on the one hand, the children are indoctrinated through torture who their “Mummy”, “Daddy”, etc. is, while on the other hand strangers can simply call themselves “Granny” or “Grandpa”. Here is an actual example of how young children can be forced to call other people “Daddy” or “Mummy” through torture:

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0A1Kb30IN0

When they are having flashbacks, in which they are remembering the torture and reliving it all 1:1, the screaming of young children sounds similar to, and sometimes even more heartrending than that heard in the above video.

 

There are no limits to the mind games, just as there are no limits to the torture methods or the triggers. Statements about location are also deliberately trained under torture:

Example:

“Where were you?” “At home with Daddy.”

– Here, in this context, you should ask whether the child means the familiar “Daddy” or whether they may be referring to some other “Daddy”, and also check the details of the location – “What did it look like there?” It is known from the Sadegh case that “At home with Daddy” sometimes also meant being tortured and raped by a series of other paedocriminals in strange apartments. Over a period of just under 9 months, it emerged that there had been a number of Daddies and quite a few Mummies too. “At home with Daddy” could mean in the child’s father’s apartment, but could also mean being forced into child prostitution in council flats, and in an attic which was obviously in the centre of Vienna, near the Vienna “Naschmarkt”.

Other mind games with names are also known to be played in cults: programmers sometimes take the name of deities (in the Sadegh case, one of the main programmers told the young child that he was called “Oka”), while Dr White, Dr Green, etc. are familiar names from the American programming scene.

 

A reminder

Remember that the child has survived the torture, is sitting in front of you and, being very young, can relatively quickly attain healing or huge relief, provided that they are protected from the perpetrator networks and not separated from the protecting parent. Due to their experiences, the young child has already lived through more trauma than you will probably ever experience, no matter how long you live. Therefore, bear in mind that you can’t do anything “wrong” as long as you act with benevolent, appreciative neutrality and openness, unless you abandon the child to its own resources and thus to the perpetrator networks, who not infrequently stem from the immediate family circle.

 

 

Bibliography (a selection)

Ackermann, Rolf; Clages, Horst; Roll, Holger: Handbuch der Kriminalistik: Für Ausbildung und Praxis. (Manual of Criminalistics: for training and practice.) Boorberg Verlag: Stuttgart, Munich, 2007 (second edition)

Arntzen, Dr. Friedrich: Psychologie der Kindervernehmung. (Psychology of questioning children.) Bundeskriminalamt 1970/1, Wiesbaden, 1970

Artkämper, Heiko; Schilling, Karsten: Vernehmungen: Taktik – Psychologie – Recht. (Hearing witnesses: Tactics – Psychology – Law.) Verlag Deutsche Polizeiliteratur: Hilden, 2012

Füllkrug, Michael; Schmidt, Volker; Burghard, Waldemar; Hamacher, Hans-Werner: Lehr- und Studienbriefe Kriminalistik 10. Sexualdelikte, Kindesmißhandlung. (Study materials for Criminalistics 10. Sexual offenses, child abuse.) Verlag Deutsche Polizeiliteratur: Hilden,1998

Gresch, Hans Ulrich: Unsichtbare Ketten. Der Missbrauch der Hypnose und anderer Trance-Techniken durch Kriminelle, Sekten und Geheimdienste. (Invisible chains. The abuse of hypnosis and other trance-inducing techniques by criminals, sects and intelligence services.) Self-published: Nuremberg, 2003: http://www.orwell-staat.de/cms/files/mindcontrol.pdf

Habschick, Klaus: Erfolgreich Vernehmen: Kompetenz in der Kommunikations-, Gesprächs- und Vernehmungspraxis (Grundlagen der Kriminalistik, Band 46) (Successfully questioning witnesses: Competence in the practice of communication, conversation and questioning. In: Basics of Criminalistics, Volume 46) Kriminalistik Verlag: Heidelberg, 2016

Hamacher, Hans-Werner: Naturwissenschaftliche Kriminalistik. (Scientific criminalistics) Verlag Deutsche Polizeiliteratur: Hilden, 1989, (second edition)

Hermanutz, Max; Hahn, Jürgen; Jorda, Lena: Leitfaden zur strukturierten Anhörung von Kindern im forensischen Kontext. (Guidelines for structuring hearings of child witnesses in a forensic context) Police academy: Baden-Württemberg, 2015

Hermanutz, Max; Litzcke, Sven Max; Kroll, Ottmar: Polizeiliche Vernehmung und Glaubhaftigkeit: ein Trainingsleitfaden. (Police questioning and credibility: a training guideline.) Boorberg Verlag: Stuttgart, Munich, 2005

Herrmann, Bernd; Saternus, Klaus-Steffen (Ed.): Kriminalbiologie (Band 1 der Reihe Biologische Spurenkunde). (Criminal biology. In: Vol. 1 of the series on biological trace evidence) Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006

Herrmann, Horst: Die Folter: eine Enzyklopädie des Grauens. (Torture: an encyclopaedia of horror) Eichborn Verlag: Frankfurt am Main, 2004

Hofmann, Anja: Personenidentifizierung durch Zeugen im Strafverfahren: Anforderungen an die ordnungsgemäße Durchführung von Wiedererkennungsverfahren und Beurteilung des Beweiswerts von Identifizierungsleistungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung rechtspsychologischer und kriminalistischer Aspekte. (Identification of persons by witnesses in criminal proceedings: Requirements regarding the proper conducting of identification procedures and appraisal of the evidential value of identification processes, particularly taking into account forensic psychology and criminalistics aspects.) Verlag Duncker & Humblot: Berlin, 2013

Huber, Michaela: Multiple Persönlichkeiten. Seelische Zersplitterung nach Gewalt. Durchgesehene Neuauflage. Junfermann Verlag, Paderborn 2010. (New, revised edition, first published in 1995, Fischer)

Lacter, Ellen: For Those Who Condemn Themselves for Acts Coerced Under Torture. Self-published: http://endritualabuse.org, 2017

Miller, Alison: Healing the Unimaginable. Treating Ritual Abuse and Mind Control. Karnac, London: 2012

Sadegh, Andrea: Original records of Luki Dara Sadegh. 2011ff. Vienna, Graz: http://traumabasedmindcontrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Beilage1_protokolle-interaktionen-2011-2012_strassburg2.pdf

 

 

Translated by Verity Speedwell.